[ca_audio url=”https://ontherightsideradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Jerome-Corsi-Interview.mp3″ width=”400″ height=”27″ css_class=”codeart-google-mp3-player” autoplay=”false”]
Jerome Corsi: Obama Deliberately Destroying U.S. Economy
Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage
REID’S NOTE: For the record, this cowboy has no problem with others being gay. Not my cup of tea, speaking personally, but to each their own. And I don’t have a problem with social contracts, having all the legal rights of marriage (joint ownership, tax, estate, you name it) for gay couples if that is the way they want to go. But I have HUGE problem with someone of another persuasion–whether ideological, political, economic, or social–tying to force me to adhere, or to be adversely affected by their choices. Everyone gets their choice–but they have to live with any consequences, not me. They are welcome to live in their world, but don’t screw with mine. And they will be accorded the same respect. The below is blood curdling–not because of the gay issue–see my thoughts above. But because what this woman, and any who share this view, wants is fundamental change in a society, and by necessity in a Constitution that protects a host of other freedoms foundational to my values and quality of life.
Written By Micah Clark
Even knowing that there are radicals in all movements, doesn’t lessen the startling admission recently by lesbian journalist Masha Gessen. On a radio show she actually admits that homosexual activists are lying about their radical political agenda. She says that they don’t want to access the institution of marriage; they want to radically redefine and eventually eliminate it.
Here is what she recently said on a radio interview:
“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.
The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago. (Read the rest of the article)